In-house billing is done by your own staff, while outsourcing delegates billing to a third-party company. Outsourcing saves time and often reduces errors but may cost more. In-house billing gives more control but requires trained staff and software.
Related: outsourced billing, billing comparison, practice revenue, billing staff, billing software, billing options, in-house billing, revenue control
Answer reviewed by Ken Ahbar, Certified Medical Billing Expert – updated June 2025
The choice between in-house billing and outsourced billing affects cost, efficiency, and control. In-house billing means hiring your own billing team and managing software, claim submissions, and collections internally. You retain full control but also take on more staffing, training, and compliance risk. Outsourced billing transfers those tasks to a third-party medical billing company. Outsourcing saves time, reduces the burden on staff, and often results in faster collections due to specialized tools and experience. However, it may be more expensive long term, and communication gaps can arise. Many practices start in-house and switch to outsourcing when overwhelmed. In 2025, with AI-driven software and remote tools, hybrid models are emerging—keeping front-end tasks in-house while outsourcing claims follow-up. Choosing the best model depends on your resources, patient volume, and tolerance for billing complexity. The best solution is the one that delivers reliable revenue and less stress for your practice.
Get the best rates and prices on medical billing services and medical billing software for your medical practice.
Answer reviewed by Ken Ahbar, Certified Medical Billing Expert – updated June 2025