Claims and Denials

Prior Authorization Services: Compare Follow-Up and Handoffs

Compare prior authorization services by preparation, submission, follow-up and scheduling handoffs. Ask providers to price a clear administrative scope. See current denial management prices.

3 minute read
Medical-office coordinator following up on referral documentation by telephone

Prior authorization services are worth comparing by what happens while a request is waiting. A submitted request can still leave your staff chasing documents, checking status or explaining a delay. When you compare prior authorization services, ask who follows each open item through to a documented outcome and who alerts the practice when a decision affects an appointment. See current denial management prices.

Start with one service line and its actual administrative workload. A busy imaging schedule and a small specialty practice may need different support. The goal isn’t to buy the broadest package; it’s to give every open request a visible owner without disconnecting the work from the clinicians and schedulers who supply the information. See current denial management prices.

Separate preparation, submission and follow-up

Ask providers to break their scope into three parts. Who identifies which visits need review? Who gathers the required information and submits it through the appropriate route? Who checks progress, returns missing-information requests to the practice and records the eventual decision? Put exclusions beside those tasks rather than in a separate sales brochure.

Then compare that scope with your current medical billing services. A billing company may handle some authorization work, all of it or none. Don’t assume an existing agreement covers a new service because both teams use the same patient-management system. The eligibility verification article helps keep coverage checks separate from authorization work.

Walk through a request that doesn’t go smoothly

Give each finalist the same fictional example: an appointment is approaching, a document is missing and the payer hasn’t issued a decision. Ask the provider to show the status your receptionist would see, the person responsible for follow-up and the route for urgent escalation. A note saying “pending” is much less useful than a dated action, a named owner and a clear next step.

Clinical questions must return to the appropriate practice professional. Ask how the provider requests supporting information without changing the clinical record or implying that administrative staff can make clinical decisions. Keep patient information out of sales demonstrations. Our billing onboarding checklist helps organize access and testing before outside staff begin work.

Agree on the handoff back to scheduling and billing

Find out where the outcome, reference number, applicable dates and relevant limits are recorded. Ask how changes to the planned service reach the authorization team and how the team flags information that needs rechecking. Your practice should confirm payer-specific requirements and the effect of the recorded decision before billing.

Have finalists price the same request volume, service lines, submission work and follow-up expectations. Check setup charges, additional follow-ups and work outside the standard scope. Use the billing comparison checklist to keep the proposals comparable, and the billing contract checklist to check exclusions and access after termination.

Better Billing Medical helps practices compare provider options around a clear scope. Get medical billing service prices with authorization preparation, follow-up and practice responsibilities listed separately.

COMPARE YOUR OPTIONS

Looking for a better medical billing fit?

Compare billing services, software and practice-management choices around the way your practice actually works.

Get Free Billing Quotes

CONTINUE READING

Related medical billing guidance